Antimatter by Frank Close [Book Summary – Review]

Complex ideas abound in the realm of advanced physics, from protons and electrons to black holes and white light. Antimatter, however, is the one that is the most enigmatic and misunderstood.

Fortunately, these chapters are available to provide a practical explanation of this cosmic conundrum. They’ll be able to unravel the complex science underlying this mysterious material without getting mired down in confusing calculations and clumsy algebra.

From the greatest particle accelerator in the world, hidden deep in the Alps, to the furthest limits of the known cosmos, this approachable overview will lead you. You’ll discover what distinguishes antimatter from common things and why it has perplexed and fascinated scientists for so long along the road.

These chapters will teach you

  • a quark that is not a quark;
  • how creating anything is similar to digging a hole; and
  • What mysteries do the Alps harbor?

Buy this book from Amazon

Chapter 1 – Antimatter is the mirror image of regular matter.

June 30, 1908. Something amazing occurs in the distant territory of Siberia, far east of Moscow. There was a sudden, resounding explosion. a blast that is so strong it can be seen from 700 kilometers away. 60 kilometers away, silverware melts due to the heat.

The Tunguska Event is this. A rush of energy similar to that released by a nuclear explosion or meteor impact is released by this enormous, unknown event. Atomic bombs are still decades distant at the time, and no meteorite is ever discovered there. So what brought about this disaster?

Antimatter is a possible explanation. This weird, enigmatic element unleashes energy on a cosmic scale when it interacts with ordinary stuff. A process that is 100 times more intense than nuclear fusion might begin with just one kilogram. Though it may sound like science fiction, it is true.

And what exactly is antimatter? It’s preferable to start with ordinary stuff to respond to this question. Atoms are microscopic units that make up normal stuff. Protons, neutrons, and electrons, which are even smaller electrically charged particles, make up these atoms. Protons, which have a positive charge, and neutrons, which have a neutral charge, are located at the core of each atom. Electrons, which have a negative charge, orbit the center. One positive proton and one negative electron make up the core of a basic atom like hydrogen.

A process that is 100 times more intense than nuclear fusion might begin with just one kilogram. Though it may sound like science fiction, it is true.

And what exactly is antimatter? It’s preferable to start with ordinary stuff to respond to this question. Atoms are microscopic units that make up normal stuff. Protons, neutrons, and electrons, which are even smaller electrically charged particles, make up these atoms. Protons, which have a positive charge, and neutrons, which have a neutral charge, are located at the core of each atom. Electrons, which have a negative charge, orbit the center. One positive proton and one negative electron make up the core of a basic atom like hydrogen.

It’s similar to digging a hole in that you must always build up an equal but opposing mound of soil to get further into the ground. On the other hand, matter and antimatter destroy one another if they ever come into touch. And this elimination causes a powerful gamma-ray explosion that unleashes the enormous quantity of energy that was contained in each material.

‘’We can communicate with the creator gods using antimatter, the opposite of matter.’’

Chapter 2 – After Dirac proposed the existence of positrons, other researchers discovered them.

Paul Dirac was quite quiet. The English scientist was able to remain silent over lengthy dinner gatherings. However, he posed a physics-altering query in 1928: What if negative energy genuinely existed?

Negative energy was a possibility left open by Einstein’s ideas for years, but few scientists, including Dirac, took it seriously. He contended that what we see as a vast, peaceful sea of negative energy in a study that was jam-packed with complex mathematics. In addition, he asserted that if a surge of normal energy disrupted that sea, it may result in the production of a negatively charged electron with negative energy.

Dirac presented the fundamental theory of antimatter in this claim. It initially appeared improbable. But concurrently, a growing body of experimental data supported its validity.

Carl Anderson labored hard in California while Dirac was in England figuring out the arithmetic to explain antimatter. Anderson was using a cloud chamber to study gamma rays. This sophisticated technology enables researchers to observe the trajectories that minute airborne particles take. Anderson anticipated that the gamma rays entering his chamber would dislodge the electrons from their atoms. The liberated electrons would then travel through the chamber, leaving visible trails that could be investigated.

Anderson magnetized the chamber, but an odd thing occurred. He believed that all particle routes would curve toward the positive pole of the magnetic field because electrons are negatively charged. However, several of the trajectories took an inverted curve in the direction of the antipode. Such a finding could only indicate that Anderson had discovered positrons. But from where did they come?

The solution was given by Patrick Blackett and Giuseppe Occhialini’s team of researchers. The two created their cloud chamber in 1932, adding copper plates to the top this time. The copper’s purpose was to capture cosmic rays, the sun’s intense stream of energy. The rays created a sequence of curving pathways when they hit the plate, resembling what Anderson had seen.

Blackett and Occhialini weren’t sure what to make of the outcomes at first. However, after speaking with Dirac, they understood what was taking place. Small gamma-ray bursts were produced when the copper and cosmic rays clashed. As anticipated by Dirac’s mysterious equations, these bursts disrupted the energy in the chamber and generated both electrons and positrons. There was antimatter.

Chapter 3 – Contrary to appearances, the subatomic realm is significantly more varied.

The proton, the neutron, and the electron are the three main players in the subatomic realm. These are the recognizable faces that are well-known to everybody. However, the actual cast is significantly larger, even though some of these miniature performers are very timid.

Fortunately, new tools were created by scientists in the 1950s and 1960s to locate and recognize the more elusive actors in the realm of physics. Physicists used the Bevatron at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and other cutting-edge particle accelerators to smash atoms together at increasing speeds.

The proton was divided into even smaller pieces by these high-energy collisions. As a result, we developed a far deeper grasp of reality. The universe may be divided into two general groups. The first is made up of particles known as fermions. These are any mass-bearing particles, including matter (such as protons and electrons) and antimatter (like antiprotons and positrons). Bosons, or non-substances, are included in the second group. These are massless particles. Both photons and gravitons are examples of bosons; photons carry light, and gravitons have gravity.

Protons, neutrons, and electrons were the only fermions that were known when Dirac initially hypothesized the possibility of antimatter. In the process of closely examining cosmic rays to comprehend positrons, scientists discovered a wide variety of other strange particles. They first discovered a particular heavy electron called a muon. Soon after, they discovered the pion, a luminous particle that resembled a tiny portion of a proton.

Then, in 1968, researchers at Stanford University achieved a significant advancement. They fired an electron beam at protons in a strong particle accelerator. It was discovered by the beam’s bounce that each proton was made up of three quarks. There are several variations of these extremely fundamental fermions. There are positive-charged up quarks, negative-charged down quarks, and weird quarks that are disproportionately heavy.

Amazingly, even quarks, the tiniest particles in our world, are subject to Dirac’s theory of antimatter. Quarks and antiquarks exist similarly to protons and antiprotons. A peculiar particle known as a kaon is created when these two particles collide. However, this arrangement only lasts for a billionth of a second until the quarks destroy one another.

Chapter 4 – Modern technologies are essential to our comprehension of antimatter.

Imagine a beautiful Swiss setting. Wildflower-filled meadows are surrounded by a clear, beautiful sky. In the distance, the clean, snow-capped Alps seem enormous. Nothing becomes more tranquil. There is, however, another universe of supercharged beams and high-energy explosions lying underneath this serene farmland.

That’s because the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, lies hidden beneath this pastoral setting. Some of the most cutting-edge equipment ever developed by humans is housed in this enormous research center, including the Large Electron Positron Collider and its successor, the much more potent Large Hadron Collider.

Scientists have started to grasp the skill of managing antimatter in this odd place using these potent instruments to replicate the big bang’s circumstances.

Scientists have some significant obstacles to overcome before they can research antimatter. The most obvious issue is that regular matter is present everywhere, and antimatter destroys itself when it comes into touch with it. Therefore, even though it is extremely simple to create positrons and antiprotons by causing particles to collide at high speeds, the effects often only endure a brief period.

Although it is extremely challenging, antimatter can be controlled. The procedure is as follows: First, protons clash in a particle accelerator at speeds close to the speed of light to produce antiprotons. Then, after traveling through a field of extremely cold electrons, these particles are slowed down. They are then placed inside a trap known as a Penning trap. The antimatter particles are isolated using this sophisticated technology before they are destroyed using a strong magnetic field.

This method was employed in 1995 by CERN researchers to create and store a single antiproton. The first antihydrogen atom was produced the next year using an upgraded technique. The anti-atom created in this initial effort only existed for a brief time, but the CERN team persisted. They kept perfecting the method until they could produce whole pools of antihydrogen that remained stable for several minutes by 2011.

These antimatter control experiments are crucial because they allow for a thorough examination of its characteristics. Researchers are attempting to answer a basic issue regarding the origin of the universe: Why is the matter so prevalent and antimatter so uncommon by observing the behavior of antimatter? In the following chapter, we’ll talk about this problem.

Chapter 5 – The science behind why matter predominates over antimatter is still being discovered.

Imagine competing in a chess match against a player whose abilities are exactly equal to your own. You and your competitor are so alike that every action you take is a replica of the other. He takes your black knight, while you take his white knight. You steal his black pawn, he takes your white pawn. The board would ultimately be left empty, correct?

Consider this: both matter and antimatter are exact mirror images of one another. The big bang should have produced an equal quantity of each. Therefore, the substances should have canceled each other out, leaving nothing, given their apparent symmetry and propensity for mutual annihilation.

However, here we are in a universe that is made of matter. Which begs the question, “Why?”

Matter and antimatter are genuinely exactly symmetrical in many aspects. They function in the same manner, except for their reversed charges. So, following the great bang, they ought to have either destroyed one another or parted ways, resulting in a world that was equally split fifty-fifty. There must be some difference, though, because the more we stare into space, the more it appears to be fully controlled by matter.

This idea is suggested by the kaon particle. One quark and one antiquark, each with a unique mass, make up this unstable particle. A kaon only lasts for a brief period. Weight in the form of energy oscillates between the quark and antiquark during the brief lifespan of the particle. As a result, the kaon alternates between being matter and antimatter.

This oscillation is oddly not even. This article is somewhat longer than it is an antikaon, according to experiments, making it a regular kaon. Even while this seemingly little difference is currently under investigation, it raises the possibility that matter and antimatter may be somewhat unbalanced, which would allow the matter to prevail.

The neutrino, a common particle 10,000 times smaller than an electron, provides another hint. The appearance of neutrinos can be either matter or antimatter. Both types of neutrinos are thought to have been created by the disintegration of majoron particles, which were present early after the big bang. It is believed that such majorons may have undergone unequal decay, giving ordinary neutrinos the upper hand and pushing our universe toward its present state of matter-filled space.

Chapter 6 – The usage of antimatter in everyday life is still a long way off.

In March of 2004. At the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts symposium in Arlington, Virginia, Kenneth Edwards approaches the podium. He says hello to the crowd before talking about antimatter. He says that even a bomb the size of a metropolis may be produced by a billionth of a gram in a sad and serious tone.

The audience gasps in horror. The speech generates international news coverage. What is causing all of this worry, exactly? Edwards, though, is the head of the Air Force’s cutting-edge weapons squad. His responsibility is to assist the US military in creating cutting-edge combat weaponry. People are alarmed by the prospect of a catastrophic new weapons race.

Are they right to be afraid? Will future battles be shaped by antimatter bombs’ devastating power any time soon? Fortunately, no. Such weapons are still firmly in the realm of fiction for the time being.

We already know that the annihilation produced by the collision of antimatter and matter releases an enormous quantity of energy. To put it into perspective, a nuclear reaction releases around 1% of the energy held within an atom. A matter-antimatter annihilation, however, releases all of it. Our planet may undergo a revolution if this force is harnessed. This energy might be used to power extraordinarily quick trips throughout the solar system or to produce weapons with enormous destructive power.

Why then haven’t we used the potential of antimatter given this capability? We don’t have enough of it, to start with. We must produce antimatter to access it since our reality is entirely made of matter. It takes a lot of time, effort, and money to complete this procedure, which is extremely inefficient. With the technology we now have, it would take billions of years and cost trillions of dollars to produce just one gram.

In addition, once antimatter is produced, it takes a lot of energy to store. Antiprotons and other similar particles have a large negative charge, which causes them to naturally resist one another. With the current Penning trap technology, it would be almost impossible to properly hold any amount larger than a tiny fraction.

But despite these obstacles, individuals still have dreams. Antimatter storage solutions are still being sought by organizations like the Positronics Research Institute in Santa Fe, New Mexico. According to one theory, a positron and an electron should be paired to form a charge-free positronium atom. Such an element may be more durable and stable with careful magnetic field management. Any plans for an antimatter engine or an explosive weapon, however, will stay in the conceptual stage until scientists make another advancement.

Antimatter by Frank Close Book Review

Antimatter is a genuine material that is challenging to comprehend as well as far more challenging to investigate. Positrons and antiprotons, two examples of antimatter particles, are mirror reflections of their normal counterparts. If matter and antimatter ever come into contact, they will destroy each other and produce enormous amounts of energy. Antimatter is unlikely to find any use shortly, even though Paul Dirac and other mathematicians have described its characteristics with beautiful equations, and CERN researchers have produced small amounts of it in the lab.

Buy this book from Amazon

Download Pdf

Download Epub


Savaş Ateş

I'm a software engineer. I like reading books and writing summaries. I like to play soccer too :) Good Reads Profile:

Recent Posts