Autonomy by Lawrence D. Burns, Christopher Shulgan (Book Summary)


Buy this book from Amazon


Interstates gagged with traffic; vehicle accidents happening each moment; perilous contamination and the rambling curse of parking areas – our dependence on cars is a sort of franticness. What’s more, this is before we’ve considered the broad outcomes of non-renewable energy source reliance, from wars in the Middle East to a calamitous climate crisis.

In any case, it doesn’t need to be this way. The eventual fate of spotless, self-driving vehicles is not too far off, where we’ll have the option to bring a ride at the pinch of an application. We’ll unwind as we whizz along in solace, safe in the information that we’re not dirtying the planet – and we’ll never need to stress over stopping, mile-long roads turned parking lots or human mistake in the driver’s seat again. 



In the accompanying parts, you’ll find what transport may resemble in a couple of decades after the inside ignition motor has been consigned to historical centers. What’s more, you’ll perceive how fearless, wild, geeky individuals – from a gathering of roboticists contending in the desert, to the superpowers of Silicon Valley and General Motors – carried this future closer to us. 


1 – Fuel controlled vehicles are all over the place, yet they’re amazingly wasteful.


Tune in to your surroundings for a minute. Except if you’re somewhere down in the wide-open, out adrift or on a desert island, you’ll no doubt hear the VR-VR-vroom of a vehicle’s interior ignition motor. 

It’s a creation that has changed the cutting edge world, gagging it with fumes exhaust and filling it with commotion contamination. Also, given this significant expense, you may be astonished to discover that the inside ignition motor and the gas-swallowing vehicles it forces use vitality wastefully. 

Under 30 percent of the vitality from the fuel that goes into your vehicle is utilized to drive it along the street. The rest of squandered as warmth or used to control embellishments like headlights, radios and forced air systems. At that point, because the normal vehicle weighs around 3,000 pounds and the normal individual weighs around 150 pounds, just a small 5 percent of the fuel vitality changed over into movement is utilized to move the driver. 

What’s more, gas-fueled vehicles use space wastefully, as well. Think about those roads turned parking lots that snake on for miles, entire urban areas brought to a halt by swarms of busy time vehicles. The normal speed in clogged urban areas, as indicated by the US Department of Transportation, can be as low as 12 mph, which is exceptionally fuel-wasteful. 

It’s particularly stunning when you understand that the greater part of those vehicles isn’t full! The normal inhabitance in vehicles is simply 1.1 individuals on an everyday work drive. For vehicles with enough space for in any event five grown-ups, that is an exceptionally uneconomical utilization of room. 



Also, as we utilize our vehicles only 5 percent of the time, we need to discover a spot to store them for the other 95 percent. In this way, we devote enormous pieces of our homes to carports and garages. What’s more, our work environments, our malls, and sports arenas need to fabricate tremendous parking areas, as well – clearing over immense breadths of land that could be utilized for significant land or left to nature. 

We make “black-top warmth islands” that expansion urban temperatures, and are even ideal to add to environmental change. 

The majority of this means a mammoth, harming misuse of vitality and space. All in all, the inquiry isn’t “The reason would we need to get rid of vehicles as we use them today?” – it’s, “the reason wouldn’t we?” 


2 – Dissatisfaction with a gas-swallowing world drove some inventive individuals to dream of automation.


A significant number of our extraordinary innovations are resulting from disappointment and gloom – from early people in obscurity woodland striking rocks together to make fire, to researchers testing the advanced immunizations that have avoided so much anguish. 

Larry Page’s fantasy of a world without individuals driving petroleum derivative chugging machines is the same. Page would progress toward becoming CEO of Google and the organizer of its self-driving vehicle venture, Chauffeur. Furthermore, it was extremely close to the home feeling of dissatisfaction that motivated him to dream. 

Learning at the University of Michigan, Page didn’t possess a vehicle. Even though charming in the mid-year months, the segregated college grounds would transform into an unfriendly place throughout the winter months. It was dim by 05:00 p.m., harshly cold outside and the avenues were loaded up with hail, slush, and dark ice. 

In this bone-chilling condition, Page would need to get the transport back to his lodgings. He would watch from the bus station as others passed him by in their vehicles, cozy in their cases of warmth. They wouldn’t go by rapidly, however – such a significant number of at the college depended on vehicles that traffic frequently backed off to a creep. 

Solidifying, Larry Page started to dream of an elective world, with fast transportation frameworks including two-man portability units that could be gathered immediately. Sometime before he built up the world-changing web search tool that made his name, it was robotized vehicles that terminated his creative mind. 



For the creator, it was a sensational overall occasion that drove him to think about an option. Out traveling to Frankfurt as General Motors’ corporate leader of research, advancement, and arranging, he has gotten back to his inn to get some news. As he got back inside, he was guided into a gathering space to watch the subsequent plane collide with the World Trade Center. 

Over the coming days – seriously shaken-up, like most Americans – he reflected hard and presumed that, because the United States relied upon oil imported from the Middle East, the car business bore some fault for what had occurred. The assault had been a result of a long chain of occasions returning to that fundamental actuality. 

Right then and there, he chose that the regularly developing utilization of gas-fueled burning motors was profoundly flighty. Furthermore, he settled that it was his obligation to impel change. 


3 – Robot races were a significant early advance in the improvement of automated vehicles.


American soldiers regularly lost their lives to extemporized dangerous gadgets planted under the streets as the United States attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. Quick to maintain a strategic distance from these passings, US commanders rather started to consider shipping supplies with robotized vehicles. 

An arm of the US government, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), concluded that they would organize a computerized vehicle race that any American group could enter. With a prize of 1 million dollars, they planned to quicken advancement. 

The incredible race would be held in the Mojave Desert, with the track extending 150 miles from Barstow, California to Primm, Nevada. The prize would go to the primary group whose robot could complete in less than ten hours. 



In the months before the race, it wound up clear that the group to beat was the Red Team, from Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Mellon University. The group was driven by a tough roboticist called Red Whittaker and included Ph.D. up-and-comer Chris Urmson and a diverse group of volunteers from the neighborhood tech network. Together they dealt with transforming an old Humvee into a robot. 

They tried the robot around an old steel plant in Pittsburgh, fitting it with Light Detection and Ranging Devices (or LIDAR) and GPS following. In the wake of difficult experimentation and numerous difficulties, their Humvee, “Dust storm,” was prepared for the race. 

On the morning of March 13, 2004, the race started. Different robots took off of their beginning chutes; a robotized bike dashed away from the beginning line and spilled straight; another crashed into a solid boundary. “Dust storm” went a short way, hit a roughage parcel, at that point proceeded for 7.3 miles before stalling out on the raised shoulder of a street and wearing out one of its tires. Its race was finished, to the unpleasant frustration of the group. 


It was a tremendous let-down. Yet rather than consummation things there, DARPA’s executive, Tony Tether, made that big appearance and declared the second race in a year, this time with a prize of 2 million dollars. 

Although this race had felt like a let-down to the challengers, what happened was that, as they contended, the architects and roboticists had made extraordinary specialized jumps to make functional robotized vehicles. The perspiration and tears of these early battles would satisfy later on, as we’ll find in the following section. 


4 – During DARPA’s robot races, explicit progressions were made that would shape automation well into what’s to come.


With expert PC researchers and novices both battling to fabricate robots that could travel long removes over the desert, numerous indispensable developments were made. 

The first includes a German PC researcher named Sebastian Thrun, who was dealing with Stanford University’s entrance into the challenge. In the wake of reading for his Ph.D. in Germany, he moved to Pittsburgh to fill in as a teacher at Carnegie Mellon University. While he was there, during the 1990s, he was associated with a task to build up a robot exhibition hall manage for Washington’s Smithsonian Museum. 

Naming the robot “Minerva,” he gave it a couple of camera focal points for eyes and a red mouth that could grimace with dismay. Yet, underneath the robot’s funny appearance was some genuine specialized development. As the gallery was packed with guests and held numerous significant shows, the robot would need to abstain from catching obstructions. 

Thus, Thrun fixed it with laser extend discoverers and an AI calculation and sent it out onto the unfilled historical center floor during the evening. The robot would then cautiously guide and log its environment. To keep away from people, it would expect that any new impediment was to be maintained a strategic distance from, and would stop securely. 

Utilizing fundamentally the same as innovation, the Stanford group’s robot, “Stanley,” won the subsequent DARPA race, which occurred on October 8, 2005, along the California/Nevada state line. What’s more, in this way, Thrun’s emphasis on landscape mapping and programming aptitude would unravel an essential bit of the riddle for automated vehicles. 



At that point, Red Whittaker’s group – whom we met in the past flicker – hit upon another essential development. This was the “shake and shimmy” technique. At the point when their robot experienced a hazardous situation, where it couldn’t make certain about the landscape or moving toward snag, it would stop, gradually invert and creep forward, until it discovered its direction. 

Like somebody with twofold vision, it did this to reassess the situation. At that point, it could come back to its standard activity. Once more, the consequences this would have for security in future computerized driving turned out to be clear. 

These advancements wouldn’t have occurred without the weight of the races, which constrained profitable missteps on the various groups. What’s more, a large number of these individuals, as Chris Urmson and Sebastian Thrun, who might both proceed to take a shot at Google’s Chauffeur venture, would assume basic jobs later on for mechanization. 


5 – Detroit and Silicon Valley were urgent to the advancement of automated vehicles.


Henry Ford’s institutionalization of vehicle production in the mid-twentieth century proclaimed the period of individual vehicle proprietorship. For some, Americans, owning a vehicle would turn into an announcement of national character and individual flexibility. Without Ford and his developments in car creation, present-day America wouldn’t be the equivalent – topographically, mechanically or socially. 

Furthermore, the focal point of mass-created autos in America was Detroit: a lumpy, mechanical powerhouse of a city. 

Following Ford’s rich building inheritance, Detroit’s carmakers centered around vehicles’ “equipment” – the stray pieces, cylinders, and suspension. For a long time, vehicle fabricating in Detroit implied sleek creation lines and welding irons. 

American industry and vehicle assembling were synonymous for quite a while, and when a couple of forwarding masterminds started to talk about automated vehicles and PCs, Detroit’s automobile producers scoffed and disregarded the thought. 

Be that as it may, those forward masterminds kept improving, in a spot that couldn’t have been increasingly unique concerning Detroit: the tech-fixated registering asylum of Silicon Valley. 

Instead of by and large wearing mechanics, it was a position of PC researchers – individuals more open to coding in cooled labs than stuck in the engine of a vehicle. Silicon Valley’s specialization was programming, and it was programming that would be at the core of the new automated vehicles by Google and Tesla, in the manner in which they mapped and explored their territory. 

While there was a promise to conveying customary autos in Detroit, Silicon Valley had progressively trial air. Like Stanford’s Sebastian Thrun or Google’s Larry Page, individuals here were available to better approaches for taking care of the issues of petroleum derivative swallowing vehicles. 



One model outlines the distinction between the two spots. In a TV advertisement for Detroit’s Fiat Chrysler in 2011, the storyteller says: “Vehicles that park themselves. An unmanned vehicle was driven by a web index organization.” Then there’s an interruption, before the storyteller says, “We’ve seen that motion picture. It closes with robots gathering our bodies for vitality.” 

Be that as it may, regardless of this contention, the voyage to computerization is more muddled than a straightforward double. Without Detroit’s heritage, the general thought of individual portability wouldn’t have molded the American mind as it did. 

What’s more, in the mid-2000s, the two universes, the former one of the equipment and the enhanced one of programming, met. That is the point at which Detroit’s General Motors, driven by the creator, pushed forward the advancement of option impetus vehicles and catalyzed the computerization upheaval. Peruse on to perceive how. 


6 – As GM designed electric vehicles, it turned out to be evident that extreme changes were en route.


GM had put resources into the innovative work of option drive vehicles vigorously by 2005. These models produced power with their hydrogen-controlled energy units – water vapor being their sole discharge. 

Furthermore, it was as of now that the creator, who was GM’s corporate leader of the research, experienced something of a revelation, one that uncovered to him the eventual fate of the whole car industry. 

At some point, Byron McCormick, a lead expert building up GM’s E-Flex Architecture electric vehicle, requested that the creator tail him to GM’s Vehicle Assessment Center. This was a huge distribution center, the size of five football fields, where designers would stall vehicles to their segment parts to find out about new progressions in the automobile business. There, McCormick guided the creator into a region separated into three narrows. 

In the main sound, there was a Chevy Malibu, completely dismantled. It was made out of various parts, from its inward burning motor, guard, and radiator, to every individual nut and fastener. 

In the following narrows, there was a progressively present-day vehicle, a Toyota Prius, additionally deconstructed. It had significantly more parts. 

At that point, in the last narrows, sat the E-Flex Architecture. It was a smoothly moderate machine and, contrasted with the gas-fueled vehicles, there was almost no to it. 

The creator realized this would have a gigantic thump on impacts for the entire car industry. 

With the more established gas-controlled vehicles, there were a huge number of independent parts, all produced by various providers. A considerable lot of these providers have names like Denso, Delphi, and Visteon, and they offer their parts to Honda, Volkswagen, and Toyota. 



These are the individuals who make sparkle plugs, carburetors, valves, fan belts, and cylinders. What the creator saw here was what’s to come. These providers would need to adjust – or leave the business. 

He could see, additionally, that developing electric vehicles would require far fewer specialists, requiring rarer types of individual ability. Furthermore, along these lines, they would be a lot less expensive to make. 

What’s more, he understood that he was taking a gander toward the finish of age for mechanics. If a vehicle’s working was to depend more on hardware and less on individual parts, at that point the eventual fate of car transportation would have a place with programming coders. 

At the point when the creator demonstrated these vehicles to General Motors’ CEO, Rick Wagoner, Wagoner made it obvious: the advancements before him, he stated, would put a conclusion to the incorporated automobile industry as the world had known it. 


7 – We are entering another period of automation that will be immensely problematic.


Did you watch the movie La La Land? The film starts with a scene commonplace to a large number of us today: four paths of traffic at a halt on a stretch of the turnpike. Drivers lean out of their vehicles, exhausted and sweltering in the late spring evening. 

Future ages will watch this film and marvel why everybody was caught that way. Being stranded in rush hour gridlock for such a long time will appear to be strange to them. We’re on the cusp of a change that will make scenes like this a relic of past times. 

To start with, the entire idea of private vehicle proprietorship will arrive at an end. 

Today, to partake in specific pieces of current society, vehicle proprietorship is significant. For example, it’s practically difficult to live in suburbia or the wide-open, in many nations, without owning a vehicle. We’ve organized our transportation frameworks altogether around the private responsibility for. What’s more, for a few, the vehicle goes about as a materialistic trifle. 

The majority of this will reach an end. As opposed to our very own private vehicle, the creator says that we’ll call a self-ruling vehicle utilizing an application – simply as we do with Uber today. These vehicles will be custom-made to situate two individuals, as we make most voyages alone or with one other individual. We’ll at that point be carried precisely to where we need to go, saying farewell to the vehicle, which we’ll most likely never observe again. 



For organizations, the change will be groundbreaking. Most importantly, the expense of the whole deal conveyance and trucking will diminish by around 50 percent. This will be a tremendous lift to efficiency, permitting online business to thrive in a manner impossible previously. Think about the numerous independent companies for whom travel costs mean they need to adhere to a minor, confined market – the world will open up to them. 

Be that as it may, it won’t all be sure. For the numerous workers and entrepreneurs who bring home the bacon as drivers, this change will be a profoundly stressing one. Furthermore, automobile makers should change from offering vehicles to singular clients to working extraordinary armadas of self-driving taxicabs. 

There will be unanticipated results, as well. By what method will it alter our perspective sets? What will the scene resemble? In our best sci-fi, we can now and again envision that future. 

In the last part, we’ll think about this coming world. 


8 – An ordinary regularly scheduled drive could appear to be extremely unique later on.


Meet the family of four, with Mary and Thomas, and their nine-year-old child Tommy Jr and eleven-year-old Tammy, Wilkersons. They live in the Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, in the year 2031. 

They’re having breakfast before the everyday drive to class and work. The youngsters are playing augmented reality PC games and messaging companions, while their folks swipe through holographic papers. 

A little while later, the family should set off on their everyday drive. 

A cell phone buzz cautions them that their ride has touched base, from the vehicle sharing organization “Maghicle.” They get into a four-seater vehicle, controlled by hydrogen power modules. Tommy Jr. yells: “Ride start!” 

This drive is not normal for the ones that the youngsters’ folks did with their very own folks. For a beginning, as they don’t need to drive, the family can get to know one another in the hour-long drive. They mess around and take a gander at photos of their ongoing occasion, all in cooling comfort. 

What’s more, the ride is smooth, with no jerky stop-start movement. This implies the kids can investigate schoolwork with their folks, without them all inclination carsick. 

Outside the vehicle windows, the world appears to be unique, as well. Complex calculations imply that autos keep a sheltered good ways from one another, and traffic streams easily, ceaselessly. There is something illusory about the exhibition, similar to a shore of fish consummately blended. 



Accidents have been disposed of – the keep going mishaps were quite a while in the past, in the early preliminary long periods of robotization. 

Furthermore, the roads are structured given walkers preeminent. The majority of the space that was once devoted to stop is currently involved in wide, green walkways. Instead of parking garages, there are parks, squares, and clamoring bistros. 

The vehicle stops at an organizing region at the school, and the youngsters get out. At that point, on another walkway, their folks pursue, giving each other a fast kiss farewell. “See you here at five,” they state. Their vehicle stars off without anyone else, to locate its next passage or to hang tight for another task, in a world that is both like and not at all like our own.


Autonomy: The Quest to Build the Driverless Car—And How It Will Reshape Our World by Lawrence D. Burns, Christopher Shulgan Book Review


How we use gas-guzzling vehicles today is much the same as franticness. They are perilous, wasteful and ecologically disastrous. The future has a place with automation – the product of a long battle by roboticists, PC researchers and designers hailing from both Silicon Valley and the old vehicle fabricating industry. 

This future will permit us more opportunity and time and will be significantly less expensive, while the new elective impetus motors will decrease our ecological effect. 


Utilize Public Transport 

On the off chance that there’s one major takeaway from this book, past the future guarantee of full automation, it’s that we should make far fewer vehicle ventures. Along these lines, whenever you have to get from suburbia to the downtown, or from the air terminal to downtown, bounce on a transport, train or cable car. At that point, when you’ve done that, campaign your administration for better open vehicle joins!


Buy this book from Amazon



Download Pdf


https://goodbooksummary.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/Autonomy+by+Lawrence+D.+Burns%2C+Christopher+Shulgan+Book+Summary.pdf


Download Epub


https://goodbooksummary.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/Autonomy+by+Lawrence+D.+Burns%2C+Christopher+Shulgan+Book+Summary.epub


Audiobook Sample


Savaş Ateş

I'm a software engineer. I like reading books and writing summaries. I like to play soccer too :) Good Reads Profile: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/106467014-sava-ate

Recent Content