The Right Side of History by Ben Shapiro (Book Summary)


Buy this book from Amazon


The common Westerner appreciates both an agreeable life and the opportunity of living in a popularity based society – benefits which apparently are underestimated. For what reason are individuals so despondent? For what reason does as such quite a bit of current life appear implanted with displeasure?



Can any anyone explain why Clinton and Trump’s supporters don’t simply differ yet appear to effectively doubt and loathe one another? Furthermore, for what reason is there such a great amount of indignation in open life that the creator, an Orthodox Jew, is blamed for being a neo-Nazi by some on the left, and is sent enemy of Semitic maltreatment by others?

An excessive number of individuals appear to have become tied up with the possibility that the West is something harming or dishonorable, and not a colossal power for good on the planet. These squints make a stride back and investigate the philosophical establishments of the West, and its attention on good reason, reason, logical revelation and individual freedom.

The creator advises us that the West’s prosperity is based on the twin establishments of Jerusalem and Athens – the Bible and the colossally persuasive musings of the old Athenian logicians. He likewise contends that social orders which stray from this double philosophical inheritance are not to be wanted.


Genuine joy is gotten not from joy but rather from good reason.


Do you consider yourself happy? If not, you unquestionably aren’t the only one. as indicated by a 2014 story in the Washington Post. About seventy-five percent of Americans state they’re not sure that life for the cutting edge will be superior to anything today.

For what reason would we say we are so dejected? All things considered, maybe this is on the grounds that we’ve dismissed what satisfaction really is. We partner it with joy – engaging in sexual relations, playing golf or viewing our youngsters develop. In any case, the Bible and the logicians of Athens disclose to us that genuine satisfaction originates from driving a real existence of good reason.

In the Hebrew Bible, the word utilized for bliss is Simcha, which means right activity in accordance with God’s will. It is directed to live with Simcha and celebrate the reason that God has given people. As Solomon says, “There is nothing preferred for an individual over to cheer in his work since that is his parcel.”



The logicians of Athens took a comparative view. Aristotle, for instance, built up an idea of the joy that was likewise about carrying on with a decent life. In any case, a great life for Aristotle was anything but an abstract idea that we can decide for ourselves.

For him and his supporters, something was great in the event that it satisfied its motivation. A decent watch, to give a cutting edge model, tells the time. What’s more, great human acts in accordance with reason since what makes people exceptional is our ability for reason, and our capacity to utilize motivation to investigate the world.

So both the Bible and the Athenian scholars landed at comparative ends. Genuine joy in life originates from good reason, regardless of whether that is serving God with happiness, or following our ethical obligation as people to seek after reason.


This may sound like diligent work. Satisfaction, in this view, isn’t tied in with skipping at a celebration, however rather about carrying on with a decent, intentional life. What’s more, this increasingly genuine methodology is the best way to open genuine importance throughout everyday life.

The Austrian specialist and Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl wrote in his diary that the individuals who saw no reason in life were rapidly lost. He contended that, so as to endure, those made up for a lost time in the awful occasions of World War II needed to rapidly discover that what made a difference was not what they anticipated from life. What made a difference, rather, was what life expected of them.

So since we comprehend the connection among’s bliss and good design, how about we investigate what this implies by and by.


To dismiss the Judeo-Christian premise of Western human advancement is to dismiss the ideas of advancement, equity, and through and through freedom.

Rulers were called as Son of Ra, as a title, in old Egypt; Ra being the superior Egyptian divine force of the sun. What’s more, in Rome, heads were viewed as gods as late as the year 14 CE, when Emperor Augustus has proclaimed a divine being as he kicked the bucket.

For quite a long time, the disparity of man was acknowledged. Children of Ra were divine and could decide the result of their lives. In any case, every other person needed to acknowledge the present circumstance that the divine beings had given them. It was the Bible that gave us the idea of human uniformity.

This was a standout amongst the most persuasive improvements ever of and human progress. As the Bible states, “God made man in his picture, in the picture of God he made him; male and female he made them.” All people, not simply rulers, were shaped by God in his picture.

Essentially, the Bible likewise presented the idea that all people have the opportunity of decision, and that we can appreciate the esteem that this gives our lives. Undoubtedly, the creation story is a story of how the absolute first man, Adam, utilized his opportunity to pick wrongly. We are every one of Adam’s relatives.

In any case, it isn’t just the idea of choice that originated from a Judeo-Christian idea. The idea of advancement, on which such a large amount of current political idea is based, is unmistakably Judeo-Christian in nature.

In numerous societies, history has no closure or starting. The Greeks, for instance, considered them to be as moving around, with repeating history, and in this way no vision of advancement. What’s more, in pre-scriptural agnostic conviction frameworks, when the divine beings mediated on the planet, they did as such to advance their very own personal circumstance and wanted to propel advance on the planet.



The Bible’s God, nonetheless, is completely engaged with driving advancement. In the tale of creation, he mediates step by step, making increasingly more mind-boggling each time. Furthermore, at whatever point he accordingly mediates, it is to show exercises or to improve a ton of men, for example, when he protects Noah and his family.

So next time you hear a government official discussion about advancement, recall that the idea owes a great deal to religion.


The logicians of Athens gave us a reason.


God raised man over the dimension of creatures by giving him a genuine mission and good reason, this is instructed by the Bible.

The logicians of Athens, then again, strengthened man’s rise not by a relationship with God, however through man’s very own capacities. The Athenian savants’ inheritance toward the West was to instruct that we people, alone and novel on the planet, have the personnel of reason. We have the ability to seek after learning, to think intelligently and to investigate the world.

This showing established the framework for present-day popular governments.

Today, we assume that individuals will contemplate political and administrative structures. In any case, it wasn’t generally so. It was the Greek scholars who, as a major aspect of their utilization of motivation to their general surroundings, began applying motivation to how government functions.

That didn’t generally prompt fair reasoning. The thinker Plato accepted that simply the best and most astute should assume a job in administering, and he pushed the development of a class of savant rulers.



Be that as it may, Aristotle dismissed Plato’s elitism and contended for a type of government that was halfway vote based, and incompletely dependent on the experience and insight of the old and noble, in a sort of early philosophical endeavor at an arrangement of balanced governance.

The Athenian rationalists likewise made the conditions for present-day science, through their mutual inclination to comprehend their general surroundings.

Pythagoras, a scholar of the 6th century BCE, accepted that individuals could discover amicability with the universe by getting it. His quest for such congruity drove him to contemplate arithmetic and to make noteworthy disclosures, for example, the Pythagorean hypothesis.


Different thinkers landed on whole speculations of presence. Already, agnostic social orders had to a great extent acknowledged that the world was as it might have been, made by the divine beings. Be that as it may, Athenian rationalists endeavored to investigate the world with reason, so as to comprehend it better.

Heraclitus, for instance, who lived somewhere in the range of 535 and 475 BCE, built up the idea of logos, the possibility of a total arrangement of intelligent reason sitting behind the world we possess. These endeavors to comprehend the world, as we’ll find in the following squint, epitomized the soul of examination that would at last lead toward the West’s worldwide predominance in science and innovation.


Science and the privileges of the individual flourished under Christianity.


Science and every one of the wealth and marvels it has given the cutting edge world is maybe the most celebrated of all the West’s inheritances. It’s turned out to be in vogue to accept that religion has by one way or another been a prohibitive power on science; that science has thrived in spite of Christianity. Yet, that is essentially not the situation.

Actually, practically every extraordinary researcher the world had ever observed was religious before the period of Darwinism. Take Nicole Oresme, who in the fourteenth century found that the Earth turns on its hub.

He was a minister of Lisieux in France. Or then again the popular Nicolaus Copernicus, who guessed that the Earth moves around the sun, as opposed to the next path around. In addition to the fact that he served his congregation as a restorative guide, however, his popular 1543 work On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres joined a letter to the pope at the time, Paul III.

The facts confirm that the Christian church became impervious to logical speculations about the world that developed in the fifteenth and sixteenth hundreds of years from scholars like Copernicus.



Most broadly, the Church aggrieved the researcher Galileo for seeking after Copernican hypotheses about the Earth rotating around the sun. Yet, notwithstanding this, Galileo himself never lost his conviction that science was a course to God. He, and others like him, accepted that righteous men had an obligation to investigate God’s universe.

While science was ascending along these lines, so too was the confidence in human opportunity. Here, the logician John Locke, who lived from 1632 to 1704, was pivotal.

Locke accepted that everybody had regular rights, originating from our ethical obligations. We have an obligation not to take, in this way it pursues that we have a characteristic ideal to property.


We have an obligation not to execute, consequently a privilege to live. Furthermore, as we have an obligation not to abuse others, we in this manner reserve a privilege to freedom.

With respect to governments, Locke accepted that their job was to secure their natives’ normal rights to life and freedom. As an augmentation of this conviction, he declared that administrations ought to require assent. All things considered, if a legislature acted against common rights by denying its kind of property, the general population would reserve the privilege to revolt.

Locke’s reasoning, and his conviction that legislature had only three obligations – to protect life, to safeguard freedom by managing equity, and to subsidize open merchandise – would be very compelling, as we’ll find in the following section.


As opposed to the pioneers of the French Revolution, the Founding Fathers of America grasped the best of both Jerusalem and Athens.


The principal nation on earth to be unequivocally grounded in reasoning was The United States of America.

Thomas Jefferson, who was a coauthor of the Declaration of Independence, even said that the record was an endeavor to revere the brightness of masterminds like Aristotle, Cicero, and Locke.

The announcement unequivocally expresses that all men are made equivalent, a conviction based upon the Bible’s idea of man made in God’s picture. It cherishes life, freedom and the quest for joy as crucial rights, expanding on Locke’s reasoning. What’s more, by affirming that righteousness looking for adherents are essential to a solid society, the affirmation underlines opportunity of religion.

The establishing theory laid the preparation for human satisfaction and empowered the best blessing to humankind in mankind’s history: the United States of America that has given billions of individuals around the globe their opportunity and flourishing.

We can balance this with what happens when social orders and political pioneers cast out the West’s religious and philosophical legacy. Investigate the experience of insurgency in France.

The French Revolution was conceived of an idealistic want to free man, or French men in any event, of the old requirements of intensity and religion. Denis Diderot, a rationalist whose work intensely impacted progressive pioneers, asserted he wished to choke the last ruler of France, utilizing the guts of the nation’s last cleric.



Furthermore, instead of pursuing America’s precedent by structure on hundreds of years of the Western idea, the creators of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen expressly rejected such intelligence.

In France, rights did not originate from God or preexist government. Rather, all specialist stemmed straightforwardly from the country. As indicated by the progressive chief Maximilien Robespierre, righteousness amounted to nothing not exactly an affection for France and its laws.

Also, its laws were altogether different from those in the United States. For instance, religion and free discourse were just secured to the extent that they didn’t compromise open request.


What was the consequence of this emphasis on the general population and the state, instead of the USA’s attention on individual freedom and restricted government? Several thousand were killed by the progressive routine in only two years. Another 250,000 passed on in a common war that pursued presently.

The French Revolution was a calamity. In any case, tragically, it would not be the main fizzled endeavor by legislators to disregard the West’s legacy for an idealistic future.


Endeavors to organize the group to the detriment of people flourished in the twentieth century.


At the core of the French Revolution, and the intuition behind it was an accentuation on the system. People were all of a sudden significant not all by themselves, however, just as in they were individuals from a gathering. It’s a thought which has demonstrated perilous over and over, but then despite everything, it stays alluring for a few.

The experience of communist Russia is a grim cautioning of what can happen when the group is raised over individual rights.

Writing in 1917, and sounding to some degree like present-day communist Bernie Sanders, the Russian progressive Lenin required an enormous extension in popular government. He needed, out of the blue, a majority rule government for poor people.

In any case, he transparently perceived that his arrangements for a “vote based system for the general population” required a noteworthy abbreviation of freedom for a few. He guaranteed concealment of entrepreneurs, saying that they should be squashed by power.

Other socialist pioneers were much progressively express. Grigory Zinoviev, a key chief after the Russian Revolution, said that the socialists must convey the help of 90 million of Russia’s 100 million individuals. With respect to the nation’s rich and world-class, which made up the rest of the 10 million? They should have been destroyed, he declared.



And keeping in mind that America has never endured the revulsions of the Soviet experience, it has still encountered the damage that originates from the individuals who enthuse about focal arranging and make light of the significance of individual rights.

In the mid-twentieth century, some alleged dynamic lawmakers and masterminds proposed the disinfection of those regarded unwanted, or weight to society, in a clear offer to improve mankind. Teddy Roosevelt, for instance, proposed in 1907 that those with Down’s disorder ought to be liable to necessary cleansing.

What’s more, the originator of an association that flourishes right up ’til today held comparable perspectives.


Margaret Sanger established an anti-conception medication association in 1921 that would turn into the cutting edge Planned Parenthood. She straightforwardly required the sanitization or isolate of up to 20 million Americans. Anti-conception medication, she composed, was just the way toward sifting through the unfit and the blemished.

In the perspectives on the Founding Fathers, making a superior world was about existence, freedom and the quest for satisfaction. In the perspectives on certain socialists and progressives in the mid-twentieth century, making a superior world was tied in with living for the system. Or on the other hand, coming up short that, withering for the system.


The advanced left has grasped inborn character to the detriment of Western human progress’ philosophical legacy.


According to the author, today, the political left has relinquished truth, reason and the quest for righteousness for victimhood, just as furious tribalism that has transformed ordinary political contradictions into something significantly more dangerous.

We just need to take a gander at the in vogue governmental issues of intersectionality to see these powers at play.

Kimberlé Crenshaw, who is a UCLA educator of basic race hypothesis, authored the term intersectionality in 1989. She contended that people are individuals from various gatherings, characterized by sex, race, religion and sexual direction. Furthermore, we can just comprehend the truth of a person’s life by taking a gander at the crossing point between the various gatherings she is an individual from.

The greater minority bunches you are a piece of, the more you will endure exploitation. So an Asian Muslim lesbian encounters the world uniquely in contrast to a white hetero Christian man, for instance.

Be that as it may, the genuine objective of intersectionality is to menace into accommodation the individuals who aren’t individuals from minority gatherings, by requesting that they “check their benefit,” to utilize Crenshaw’s words as indicated by Shapiro. White individuals, for instance, must perceive the benefit that originates from being white or be cast out of acknowledged society.

Those individuals who neglect to acclimate with this hypothesis, regardless of whether they themselves originate from minority gatherings, are censured. Accordingly, the preservationist reporter Nikki Haley is viewed as by one way or another, not a lady, since she holds genius life Republican perspectives.



Furthermore, under this advanced perspective, science and reason take a secondary lounge. Some venture to such an extreme as to state that science itself is a build of benefit. Donna Hughes of the Women’s Studies International Forum contends that a logical technique is basically a device imagined by men to help their prevailing position on the planet.

Intersectional believing is only one case of how our advanced world is sliding into tribalism. Intersectionalists clarify each inconvenience they face in life through the crystal of their clan. On the contrary side of the political range, racial oppressors locate their own sort of innate solidarity in the development of the far right.

Be that as it may, while ancestral personality can give its individuals meaning, it likewise wears down the human advancement that has given us an opportunity, rights, science, flourishing, and wellbeing.


We are betraying the establishments of our progress. The thinking about the Bible and of Athens. Furthermore, on the opportunity, rights, obligation, moral reason, and logical request.

On the off chance that we need our progress to push ahead, society must rediscover these qualities.


The Right Side of History: How Reason and Moral Purpose Made the West Great by Ben Shapiro Book Review


We have everything except rejected the fundamental estimations of the West in the present age – that we are manufactured in God’s picture, and that we are furnished with motivation to investigate the world. From these ideas have come science, human rights, freedom and confidence in advancement.

By walking out on these qualities, our general public is slipping into tribalism. We should remind ourselves why the West is extraordinary before it’s past the point of no return.


Buy this book from Amazon



Download Pdf


https://goodbooksummary.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/The+Right+Side+of+History+by+Ben+Shapiro+Book+Summary.pdf


Download Epub


https://goodbooksummary.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/The+Right+Side+of+History+by+Ben+Shapiro+Book+Summary.epub


Audiobook Sample


Savaş Ateş

I'm a software engineer. I like reading books and writing summaries. I like to play soccer too :) Good Reads Profile: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/106467014-sava-ate

Recent Content